Competency-Based Methodological Strategy to Optimize Professional Driving Practices
Keywords:
Competency-based training; professional driving; road safety; practical performance; safe driving habits.Abstract
Introduction: Road safety remains a major social concern, particularly in professional driving contexts, where practical performance and safe driving habits are decisive factors in preventing traffic accidents. This study aimed to characterize practical performance and the acquisition of safe driving habits among students enrolled in the professional Type C driver’s license course at the ESPOCH CONDUESPOCH E.P. Public Driving School, in order to support a competency-based methodological strategy. The research adopted a mixed-methods approach with a descriptive scope and an explanatory sequential design. The sample consisted of 91 students and 20 instructors. Data were collected through practical performance rubrics, observation checklists of safe driving habits, Likert-type questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. The findings revealed significant gaps between declarative normative knowledge and effective performance in real driving contexts, particularly in defensive driving, risk anticipation, and self-regulation during practice. In addition, areas for improvement were identified in teaching practices, especially regarding formative feedback and the systematic use of problem-based driving situations. In conclusion, the diagnostic results support the relevance of a competency-based methodological strategy that integrates deliberate practice, authentic assessment, and the strengthening of safe driving habits, with potential benefits for professional performance and local road safety.
References
Habibzadeh Omran, Y., Habibzadeh, Y., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Sadeghi-Bazargani, H. (2023). Driving hazard perception tests: A systematic review. Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma, 11(2), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2023.95777.1370
Habibzadeh Omran, Y., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Sadeghi-Bazargani, H. (2023). Driving hazard perception components: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2023.95410.1356
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. (2025). Siniestros de tránsito: III trimestre, 2025 (Estadísticas de Transporte) [Informe]. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/Estadisticas_Economicas/Estadistica%20de%20Transporte/2025/iii_trimestre/2025_RESULTADOS_SINIESTROS_IIIT.pdf
Inga Arias, M. A., Sánchez García, T. C., & Criado Dávila, Y. V. (2019). La formación por competencias requiere una evaluación auténtica en la universidad. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 7(Edición especial). https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v30i1.1274
Kamper, S. J. (2020). Types of research questions: Descriptive, predictive, or causal. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 50(8), 468–469. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2020.0703
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Koo, M., & Yang, Y. (2025). Questionnaire use and development in health research. Encyclopedia, 5(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020065
Navas Parejo, N. F. H. (2022). Evaluación de los aprendizajes por competencias. Educación y Humanismo, 24(42). https://www.redalyc.org/journal/280/28069961009/html/
Ortiz, J. N. (2021). La evaluación de las competencias en la formación profesional: una propuesta metodológica basada en rúbricas. Revista de Investigación y Opinión, 1(1). https://www.revista-rio.org/index.php/revista_rio/article/view/353
Rana, K., & Chimoriya, R. (2025). A guide to a mixed-methods approach to healthcare research. Encyclopedia, 5(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020051
Toyon, M. A. S. (2021). Explanatory sequential design of mixed methods research: Phases and challenges. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(5), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i5.1262
Ventsislavova, P., Rosenbloom, T., Leunissen, J., Spivak, Y., & Crundall, D. (2022). An online hazard prediction test demonstrates differences in the ability to identify hazardous situations between different driving groups. Ergonomics, 65(8), 1119–1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.2016999
World Health Organization. (2023). Global status report on road safety 2023. https://www.who.int/teams/social-determinants-of-health/safety-and-mobility/global-status-report-on-road-safety-2023
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 David Eduardo Yupanqui Taipe, Raúl Alejandro Montes de Oca Celeiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that offering the public free access to research helps a greater global exchange of knowledge. Each author is responsible for the content of each of their articles.
Universidad de Oriente 