Abandonment and indifference: structural factors of youth disinterest in agriculture in the 21st century
Keywords:
Rural youth, generational change, rural development, agricultural production training, youth participation, agricultural innovationAbstract
Introduction: This research analyzes the structural factors that explain the low participation of young people in agricultural production activities in the Pastaza canton (Ecuadorian Amazon), given the evidence of a progressive aging of rural producers and a decline in youth interest in the agricultural sector. This phenomenon jeopardizes the sustainability of agricultural systems and generational renewal. Materials and methods: A qualitative, descriptive-interpretive approach with an applied design was used. The population consisted of 297 users registered with the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (MAGP) in the Pastaza canton; a purposive sample of 7 young people participating in training programs was selected. Results: The average age of the producers exceeds 45 years, reaching up to 78 years in remote parishes, which demonstrates accelerated aging in the agricultural sector. Youth participation in training programs is marginal (only 7 out of 16 registered young people). Interrelated structural factors were identified: aging of the agricultural sector, lack of relevance of training programs, negative social perceptions of agriculture (low profitability, physical exertion, low social prestige), limited economic opportunities, and weak institutional coordination aimed at rural youth. Discussion: The findings confirm trends documented in the literature on rural aging and youth disinterest in agriculture in Latin America. The low youth participation coincides with research indicating that agricultural training programs do not consider youth interests or innovative methodologies. The negative perception of agriculture as a low-profitability activity with low social prestige aligns with studies on the construction of youth professional identity in rural environments. Conclusions: Youth disinterest is not due to a lack of personal will, but rather to an agricultural, training, and institutional system that does not create attractive conditions for new generations. A comprehensive intervention is required that integrates technological innovation, entrepreneurship, access to financing, and renewed training models to ensure the sustainability of rural development in the Ecuadorian Amazon.
References
Álvarez-Muñoz, P., et al. (2022). Capacitación agrícola y participación juvenil en América Latina. Revista de Desarrollo Rural, 15(2), 45-68.
Borda, M., et al. (2021). Juventud rural y expectativas laborales en contextos amazónicos. Estudios Rurales, 11(3), 112-130.
Carton, H. (2009). La desagrarización del campo mexicano. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 16(50). Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
Christiaensen, L., & Rutledge, Z. (2020). Youth and agriculture in developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
FAO. (2022). Youth in agrifood systems. FAO Agricultural Development Series. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9970en
Flores, M., & Salcedo, R. (2022). Juventud rural y políticas públicas en América Latina. Revista Latinoamericana de Desarrollo Rural, 8(1), 33-52.
Glass, J., Currie, M., Pinker, A., Reed, M., Meador, E., & Markantoni, M. (2022). Traduciendo la teoría de la resiliencia comunitaria a la práctica: un enfoque Delphi deliberativo. Sociologia Ruralis, 63, 661-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12397
Guarinda-Ceballos, M. H., & García-Hevia, S. (2025). Impacto del desarrollo de prácticas en las competencias técnicas en estudiantes de agropecuaria. MQRInvestigar, 9(2), e612. https://doi.org/10.56048/MQR20225.9.2.2025.e612
Gutiérrez Escobar, L. (2019). Diversidad biocultural, agricultura raizal y soberanía alimentaria en San Andrés y Providencia (Colombia). Tabula Rasa, 32, 195-225. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n32.13
INEGI. (2020). Resultados definitivos de los Censos Económicos 2019. https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ce/2019/
León Macías, K. Y., Vasconcellos Fernández, N., & Martínez Pérez, O. (2025). Impacto de las Capacitaciones Agrícolas en la Capacidad de Emprendimiento de estudiantes del Bachillerato Técnico. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar G-Nerando, 6(1), 5946. https://doi.org/10.60100/rcmg.v6i1.683
Marcia, C. (2022). Envejecimiento rural en la Amazonía ecuatoriana. Estudios Amazónicos, 14(2), 78-95.
Méndez, L. M. (2022). Emigración rural en el nordeste de Brasil: evidencia de trayectorias socioeconómicas compartidas y escenarios de cambio climático. Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.03.004
Moreno, A. (2023). Importancia de la Actividad Agrícola y la Innovación Social en los Centros Públicos de Investigación: Naciones Unidas Análisis Bibliométrico. Ciencia y Práctica, 3(5), 1-33. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8805009
Ortiz, L., & Chacón, M. (2024). Digitalización e innovación en la educación rural. Revista de Innovación Educativa, 22(1), 56-74.
Parrales-Pincay, W. W., Quinatoa-León, E. F., & García-Hevia, S. (2025). El aula invertida y el desempeño académico de los estudiantes de bachillerato técnico. MQRInvestigar, 9(1), e419. https://doi.org/10.56048/MQR20225.9.1.2025.e419
Ramos Borrero, D., & Inciarte González, A. (2023). Tendencias y factores del desinterés de los jóvenes de San Andrés, Providencia y Santa Catalina hacia el sector agrícola. La Casa del Maestro, 1(5), 217-232. https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/RVCDM/article/view/5524
Rodríguez, J., & Ramírez, P. (2022). Envejecimiento rural y relevo generacional en la Amazonía. Revista de Geografía Rural, 18(3), 145-167.
Salazar, E., & Roldán, D. (2021). Juventud y territorio en la Amazonía ecuatoriana. Estudios Territoriales, 12(4), 89-106.
Sandoval, D. (2018). Las juventudes rurales en escuelas secundarias de Malinalco, Estado de México: un esbozo hacia el futuro personal y laboral [Tesis de maestría]. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
Trujillo, P. (2019). El abandono del campo: etnografía del mundo rural en el norte de Ecuador. Revista Peruana de Antropología, 4(5).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 María Elena Cando Toapanta, Wilfrido Adán López Quinzo, Segress García Hevia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that offering the public free access to research helps a greater global exchange of knowledge. Each author is responsible for the content of each of their articles.























Universidad de Oriente