Didactic-pedagogical application in the teaching of kinematics and dynamics at the high school level
Keywords:
Physics education, kinematics, dynamics, innovative strategies, secondary educationAbstract
Introduction: The teaching of physics in secondary education continues to present a structural pedagogical challenge, characterized by the abstract complexity of its concepts and the systematic difficulties students exhibit when attempting to transfer scientific principles to the resolution of practical problems. This problem is exacerbated by the predominance of traditional, rote-learning and directive methodologies. This research aimed to analyze the impact of a didactic-pedagogical intervention in the teaching of kinematics and dynamics to first-year high school students at the "Eloy Alfaro" Educational Unit during the 2025-2026 academic year in the Chone canton. Materials and methods: The study stemmed from the problem observed in the classroom assessment: the predominance of traditional methodologies and the limited incorporation of innovative strategies, factors that restrict conceptual understanding and practical application in physics. A mixed-methods approach with an exploratory-descriptive scope and a non-experimental design was employed, combining document review with the use of structured surveys and classroom observation guides applied to a purposive sample of 60 students and the course instructor. Results: The findings demonstrate that the implementation of active teaching strategies significantly improves conceptual understanding, the interpretation of phenomena, and the ability to solve contextualized physics problems. 88.3% of the students rated the instructor's strategies as developed or highly developed; 83.4% positively valued the methodological activities designed to facilitate the understanding of uniformly accelerated rectilinear motion (UARM); in solving kinematic problems, 53.4% achieved correct answers, while in dynamic problems, 56.6% were correct. Discussion: The findings also outline a clear path for improvement: innovative strategies and virtual simulators do not replace the need for continuous reinforcement of instrumental skills such as unit conversion and algebraic manipulation, which serve as an indispensable vehicle for translating conceptual understanding into highly developed problem-solving performance. Conclusions: It is concluded that the application of active and innovative didactic-pedagogical strategies has a positive impact on the teaching-learning process of kinematics and dynamics, fostering a more participatory and dynamic classroom environment aligned with the principles of constructivism and meaningful learning.
References
Arega, N. T., & Hunde, T. S. (2025). Constructivist instructional approaches: A systematic review of evaluation-based evidence for effectiveness. Review of Education, 13, e70040. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70040
Benegas, J., Panattoni, L., & Geli, M. (2025). Impact of active learning strategies on students' conceptual understanding and self-efficacy in introductory physics courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 010114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010114
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818761583
Diquito, T. J., Dhaniaputri, R., & Acuña, A. R. (2025). Teaching strategies in physics education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(5), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.10681
Education Sciences. (2025). Newton's second law teaching strategies—Identifying opportunities for educational innovation. Education Sciences, 15(6), 748. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060748
García-Herrera, D. G., & Castro-Salazar, A. M. (2025). Impacto de las simulaciones interactivas en el rendimiento académico de física en el bachillerato ecuatoriano. Revista Chone Tecnológica, 14(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.56124/rct.v14i1.092
García-Carmona, A. (2021). Indagación científica en la enseñanza de las ciencias: una revisión de instrumentos para su observación y evaluación en el aula. Revista de Educación, 391, 105-132. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-391-472
Halim, M. G. (2025). Systematic literature review: What do the studies reveal about problem-based learning in physics education? PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning. https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2025.670694
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education.
Kandru, S., & Jameel, A. (2025). Cognitive load and problem-solving strategies in introductory mechanics: A study on kinematics and Newton's laws integration. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(3), 412-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10152-x
López-García, J. C., & Ramírez-Díaz, M. H. (2024). Transición metodológica en la enseñanza de la física secundaria: Un análisis de las prácticas tradicionales vs. activas. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 29(101), 415-439. https://doi.org/10.22201/ie.20072872e.2024.101.2185
Martínez-Torres, E., & Sánchez-Expósito, G. (2024). Obstáculos epistemológicos en el aprendizaje de la dinámica de Newton: Análisis de preconcepciones en educación media. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 42(2), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3920
Musengimana, T., Yadav, L. L., Uwamahoro, J., Nizeyimana, G., & Nkundabakura, P. (2025). Instructional strategies for enhancing students' problem-solving skills in physics: A systematic review. Discover Education, 4, 380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00733-x
Ortega-Ruiz, M. A., & Villalobos, J. A. (2024). La indagación científica en el aula de física: Desafíos curriculares en América Latina. Educación y Ciencia, 28(3), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.19053/0120-7105.eyc.2024.28.3.16430
Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de muestreo sobre una población a estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037
Rodríguez-Medina, J., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., & Agreda-Montoro, M. (2023). Dificultades de aprendizaje en la representación gráfica de la cinemática: Un estudio de caso en educación secundaria. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 67, 175-201. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.97520
Siswanto, D. A. C., Iswanto, B. H., & Rahmawati, Y. (2025). The impact of mobile learning on physics education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.11102
Suárez-Almaguer, D., Leyva-Gras, R., & Aguilera-Carcasés, A. (2023). El laboratorio virtual de física: una alternativa para el aprendizaje del movimiento rectilíneo uniformemente variado. Revista Formación y Calidad Educativa (REFCalE), 11(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8123456
Valderrama, D. A., & González Pardo, L. M. (2024). Transmutando la inercia pedagógica: Aprendizaje activo en la enseñanza de la física. Opuntia Brava, 16(4), 87-100.
Zúñiga-Arrieta, M., Alfaro-Rojas, L., & Castro-Ríos, G. (2024). Desafíos metodológicos en la enseñanza de la física en la educación secundaria: un análisis de la transición hacia el constructivismo en STEM. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación en Ciencias, 15(2), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.22456/1983-4659.138451
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eddie José Alcívar Castro , Orley Teodocio Loor-Solórzano, Yenny Alexandra Zambrano-Villegas, Betty Johana Pinargote-Bravo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that offering the public free access to research helps a greater global exchange of knowledge. Each author is responsible for the content of each of their articles.























Universidad de Oriente