Big Data in judicial case allocation to ensure procedural speed in Ecuador
Keywords:
Big Data, Procedural Expediency, Judicial System, Case Assignment, Legal InnovationAbstract
Introduction: The Ecuadorian judicial system faces constant delays and unequal case distribution, which weakens the effective application of the principle of procedural expeditiousness. Given this reality, this research poses the following question: How can the implementation of Big Data in the allocation of judicial cases in Ecuador contribute to guaranteeing the principle of procedural expeditiousness in the judicial system? To answer this question, the general objective was to determine the viability of a Big Data-based model for the allocation of judicial cases in Ecuador, aimed at ensuring compliance with the principle of procedural expeditiousness. Materials and methods: The methodology adopted a mixed approach that combined documentary, normative, and empirical analysis, including interviews with experts and surveys of judicial operators. The study identified advances in digitalization, such as the SATJE system, although these are still insufficient for a structural transformation. Results: It was evident that the current legal framework allows the use of data for judicial purposes, provided that principles such as proportionality, finality, and confidentiality are respected. The results show that the proposal has technical, legal, and institutional support, and that its implementation would allow for a more equitable distribution of the procedural burden, reduce resolution times, and strengthen transparency. Discussion: Expert validation confirmed the viability of the proposed model, highlighting its ability to improve efficiency without violating rights. Conclusions: The implementation of Big Data in the assignment of judicial cases appears to be a transformative tool, necessary to modernize the Ecuadorian justice system and strengthen access to effective judicial protection.
References
Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2021). Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales. Registro Oficial Suplemento No. 459.
Banco Mundial. (2018). Big Data y el futuro del sector público. https://www.worldbank.org
Banco Mundial. (2021). Data-Driven Justice: How Big Data Can Improve Judicial Systems. https://www.worldbank.org
Comisión Europea. (2020). Libro Blanco sobre Inteligencia Artificial. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-strategy
Consejo de Europa. (2001). Convenio sobre Ciberdelincuencia (Convenio de Budapest). https://www.coe.int
Consejo de Europa. (2018). Carta Ética Europea sobre el uso de la inteligencia artificial en los sistemas judiciales. https://www.coe.int
Consejo de la Judicatura. (2022). Informe de Gestión 2021-2022: Modernización tecnológica y fortalecimiento institucional. Quito: Consejo de la Judicatura.
Escobar Jara, J. I. (2023). Aplicaciones de la neutrosofía en la inteligencia artificial: Implicaciones para sistemas judiciales [Artículo de revisión]. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Neutrosóficas, 5(1), 45-62.
Escobar, J. I., & Leyva, M. Y. (2024). Big Data y justicia: desafíos y oportunidades en la administración judicial. Editorial Tecnológica.
Fernández, J. (2022). Digital Transformation in the Judiciary: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Law and Technology, 15(3), 45-60.
García, L., & Pérez, M. (2021). Modernización judicial y eficiencia procesal: un análisis comparado. Revista Internacional de Administración de Justicia, 12(3), 45-62.
García, M. (2020). Big Data and Judicial Efficiency: Lessons from Latin America. Latin American Law Review, 8(2), 112-130.
González, R., & Martínez, F. (2023). Inteligencia artificial y justicia: hacia un modelo híbrido de administración judicial. Revista de Derecho y Tecnología, 9(1), 78-95.
Hildebrandt, M. (2019). Law for Computer Scientists and Other Folk. Oxford University Press.
Lemos, R., & Canabarro, D. (2021). Big Data e o Sistema de Justiça: Perspectivas para a governança algorítmica do Poder Judiciário. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, 11(1), 123-144.
Leyva Vázquez, M. Y. (2024). Derecho y nuevas tecnologías: Retos y perspectivas en la administración de justicia en Ecuador. Editorial Jurídica Nacional.
López, R. (2021). Technological Innovation in the Judiciary: Case Studies from Argentina. Journal of Legal Innovation, 7(1), 78-95.
Lu, J., Cairns, L., & Smith, L. (2021). Data science in the business environment: Customer analytics case studies in SMEs. Journal of Modelling in Management, 16(2), 689-713.
Marín, J. (2019). Jurimetría y administración de justicia: una herramienta para mejorar la eficiencia judicial. Revista de Derecho Procesal, 28, 45-67.
Marr, B. (2020). Tech Trends in Practice: The 25 Technologies That Are Driving the 4th Industrial Revolution. John Wiley & Sons.
OCDE. (2014). Principios de Gobernanza Digital. https://www.oecd.org
OCDE. (2020). Justicia Digital en los Países de la OCDE. https://www.oecd.org
ONU. (2000). Convención de las Naciones Unidas contra la Delincuencia Organizada Transnacional (Convenio de Palermo). https://www.unodc.org
ONU. (2020). Manual sobre la gestión de datos en la administración de justicia. https://www.un.org
Parlamento Europeo y Consejo de la Unión Europea. (2016). Reglamento General de Protección de Datos (GDPR). https://eur-lex.europa.eu
Peña, F. (2020). Big Data en el Poder Judicial: oportunidades y desafíos. Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho y Tecnología, 5(2), 33-52.
Pérez, A. (2022). Digital Justice in Ecuador: Challenges and Opportunities. Ecuadorian Journal of Law and Technology, 10(1), 22-37.
Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2020). Data Science for Business: What You Need to Know about Data Mining and Data-Analytic Thinking (2nd ed.). O'Reilly Media.
Ramírez, A., & Torres, S. (2022). Desafíos normativos para la implementación de Big Data en la justicia. Revista Jurídica y Tecnológica, 8(4), 101-120.
Ramírez, C. (2023). Big Data in the Ecuadorian Judiciary: A Path Towards Efficiency. Latin American Journal of Legal Studies, 12(4), 55-70.
Reiling, D. (2020). Courts and Artificial Intelligence. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(2), 1-12.
Rodríguez, P. (2021). Los sistemas de asignación de causas judiciales en Ecuador: estado actual y perspectivas de modernización. Revista Ecuatoriana de Derecho Procesal, 6(1), 77-98.
Smith, J., Brown, K., & Lee, H. (2020). Barriers to technological innovation in judicial systems: A global perspective. Journal of Legal Technology, 5(2), 33-49.
Torres, L. (2023). Ethics and Big Data in the Judiciary: A Global Perspective. Global Law Review, 18(2), 201-220.
Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2021). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019
Yu, W., Zhao, G., Liu, Q., & Song, Y. (2021). Role of big data analytics capability in developing integrated hospital supply chains and operational flexibility: An organizational information processing theory perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120417
Zarsky, T. (2016). The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions: An Analytic Road Map to Examine Efficiency and Fairness in Automated and Opaque Decision-Making. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 118-132.
Access Now & Amnesty International. (2018). The Toronto Declaration: Protecting the rights to equality and non-discrimination in machine learning systems. https://www.accessnow.org/the-toronto-declaration/
Consejo de Europa. (2021). Recommendation CM/Rec(2021) on the ethical use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems. https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence
Consejo de la Judicatura. (2024). Resolución 043-2024: Regulación del tratamiento de datos personales en el sistema judicial ecuatoriano. Quito, Ecuador.
Parlamento Europeo y Consejo. (2016). Reglamento (UE) 2016/679 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 27 de abril de 2016 (Reglamento General de Protección de Datos). Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea.
UNESCO. (2021). Recomendación sobre la ética de la inteligencia artificial. París: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura.
République Française. (2019). Loi n° 2019-222 du 23 mars 2019 de programmation 2018-2022 et de réforme pour la justice, article 33.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marjori Mishell Herrera Suárez, Cristhian Gerardo Chocho Piscocama, Sandra Patricia Macero Villafuerte, Noel Batista Hernández
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that offering the public free access to research helps a greater global exchange of knowledge. Each author is responsible for the content of each of their articles.
Universidad de Oriente 