The Post-Contractual Phase in Public Procurement in Ecuador: Approaches, Activities and Legal-Administrative Responsibilities

Authors

  • Willian Paul Aviles Quiñonez Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador, Ecuador
  • Gladys Marisol Carvajal Burgos Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador, Ecuador
  • Carlos Danny Ponce Campoverde Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador, Ecuador
  • Maricarmen Villon Moran Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador, Ecuador

Keywords:

Post-contractual phase, public procurement, latent defects, economic imbalance, asset management

Abstract

Introduction. Despite its regulatory recognition, the post-contractual phase in Ecuadorian public procurement constitutes a weak link in the procurement cycle, limiting the realization of sustainable public value. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively analyze its conceptual approaches, regulatory framework, operational activities, legal and administrative responsibilities, and main challenges. Materials and Methods. The PRISMA 2020 methodology was followed, with searches in academic databases and institutional repositories. Forty-eight documents (articles, regulations, technical reports, theses) published between 2008 and 2024, addressing the post-contractual phase in the Ecuadorian context, were included. The data were extracted and narratively synthesized into predefined thematic categories. Results. The phase is conceptualized as a comprehensive process that goes beyond the initial receipt of goods or services, aimed at ensuring the sustainability of public value. Its regulatory framework is robust (COA, LOSCP), but its operational effectiveness is limited by a lack of technical capabilities, fragmented information systems, and an administrative culture focused on formal compliance. Key asset management and evaluation activities were identified, as well as critical legal risks such as latent defects and economic imbalance, which require proactive management mechanisms. Discussion: A significant gap exists between the legal framework and administrative practice. The findings reflect interrelated systemic challenges that require a comprehensive strategy. Conclusions: A state policy is needed to strengthen this phase through the development of operational protocols, integrated information systems, specialized training, and the promotion of a culture of evaluation and accountability.

References

Ameyaw, C., Mensah, S., & Osei-Tutu, E. (2012). Public procurement in Ghana: The implementation challenges to the Public Procurement Law 2003 (Act 663). International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management, 2(2), 55-65. https://es.scribd.com/document/491936110/IJCSCM-201012-55-65-Ameyaw-Mensah-Osei-Tutu

Arrowsmith, S. (2014). Public procurement regulation: An introduction. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2014/510008/IPOL-JURI_NT(2014)510008_EN.pdf

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial 449. https://www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/mesicic5_ecu_const.pdf

Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2017). Código Orgánico Administrativo. Registro Oficial Suplemento 306. https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/06/CODIGO-ORGANICO-ADMINISTRATIVO-COA.pdf

Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2020). Ley Orgánica del Sistema de Contratación Pública. Registro Oficial Suplemento 251. https://www.contratacionpublica.gob.ec/PDF/LeyOrganicaSistemaContratacionPublica-LOSCP.pdf

Bovis, C. (2016). Public procurement in the European Union: The economics of law and policy. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, 11(1), 4-15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26687645

Cevallos, M. (2020). La fase postcontractual en la contratación pública: Análisis jurídico y administrativo. Revista de Derecho Administrativo Ecuatoriano, 15(2), 45-67. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7805423

Contraloría General del Estado. (2019). Guía para la administración de contratos públicos. https://www.contraloria.gob.ec/Web/UserFiles/Documents/2022/Guia-para-la-Administracion-de-Contratos-Publicos.pdf

Kettunen, P., & Kallio, J. (2021). Public sector reform and the challenge of organizational culture change. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13285

OECD. (2015). Government at a glance 2015. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2015-en

Ortega, J. (2022). Gestión patrimonial y su incidencia en la fase postcontractual de las entidades públicas del Ecuador [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar]. Repositorio UASB. http://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/handle/10644/8500

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pérez, L., & Gómez, R. (2021). Gestión postcontractual y valor público en el Ecuador: Desafíos y perspectivas. Revista Maestro y Sociedad, 18(3), 112-130. https://maestroysociedad.uo.edu.cu/index.php/MyS/article/view/12571

Salazar, F., & Torres, M. (2022). Vicios ocultos en la contratación pública de equipamiento médico: Análisis de casos en el IESS. Revista de Salud Pública del Ecuador, 9(1), 78-95. https://revistas.uta.edu.ec/revistadmedicina/issue/view/149

Servicio Nacional de Contratación Pública. (2018). Manual de gestión patrimonial para las entidades públicas. https://www.contratacionpublica.gob.ec/portalcpl/descargas/MANUAL_DE_GESTION_PATRIMONIAL.pdf

Thai, K. V. (2017). International public procurement: Innovation and knowledge sharing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49280-3

Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo. (2015). Caso Toachi-Pilatón [Jurisprudencia].

United Nations Development Programme. (2017). Strengthening public procurement systems in the context of the 2030 agenda. https://www.undp.org/publications/strengthening-public-procurement-systems-context-2030-agenda

Vaca, A. (2023). El desequilibrio económico en los contratos administrativos ecuatorianos: Análisis doctrinal y jurisprudencial. Editorial LegisEcuador.

World Bank. (2017). Benchmarking public procurement 2017. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/26325

Zambrano, L. (2020). El principio de transparencia en la fase postcontractual. Revista de Control Gubernamental, 8(2), 34-52. https://www.contraloria.gob.ec/Web/UserFiles/Documents/Revista-Control-Gubernamental/Revista-No.8/3.%20El%20principio%20de%20transparencia%20en%20la%20fase%20postcontractual.pdf

Published

2026-01-26

How to Cite

Aviles Quiñonez, W. P., Carvajal Burgos, G. M., Ponce Campoverde, C. D., & Villon Moran, M. (2026). The Post-Contractual Phase in Public Procurement in Ecuador: Approaches, Activities and Legal-Administrative Responsibilities. Maestro Y Sociedad, 22(4), 4014–4021. Retrieved from https://maestroysociedad.uo.edu.cu/index.php/MyS/article/view/7339

Issue

Section

Artículos

Most read articles by the same author(s)