Traditional Debate and Model United Nations as pedagogical tools to strengthen oral expression in higher education

Abstract

Introduction: This article analyzes Traditional Debate (TD) and Model United Nations (MUN) as pedagogical strategies to strengthen Oral Expression in Higher Education. The study highlights the importance of developing communicative skills that help students minimize academic failure in the early years due to a deficiency of these skills. Materials and methods: The study applies a socio-critical approach and quasi-experimental methodology, and was applied to leveling students at the National University of Chimborazo. Results: The results showed progress and improvement in discursive quality, research, and collaborative work. Discussion: Through the application of debate, the skills of argumentation, critical thinking, and organization of ideas are simultaneously developed, thereby improving students' construction of verbal language. On the other hand, with the staging of Model United Nations in the classroom, learners negotiate, seek allies, and apply diplomacy with an international vision. Both methodologies are significant for learning. Conclusions: In conclusion, both methods applied in class were effective, comprehensive, and enhanced university oral expression.