The Job Precariousness of Uberized Workers in Ecuador: Analysis of the Inconsistency and Deficiencies in the Procedural Regulatory Infrastructure for the Protection of Labor Rights
Keywords:
World of work, Technology, Globalization, Digital platforms, New jobsAbstract
Introduction: The world of work is changing dramatically due to technology and globalization, with digital platforms creating new jobs, but also challenges in regulation and labor rights. Informality has led to greater precariousness, especially in services such as Uber, where workers face unstable contracts and little protection. The International Labor Organization (ILO) promotes the concept of decent work as a reference to assess these conditions. In Latin America, cases stand out in Mexico, Argentina, Chile, and Colombia, where collective action and legal reform are crucial to improve the situation. In Ecuador, although the Constitution seeks to protect labor rights, the lack of specific regulation for platform work leaves workers vulnerable. Materials and methods: The study uses a methodology based on a mixed approach (qualitative and quantitative) to analyze the case presented more effectively, the qualitative approach has greater presence, since the research project is of a more theoretical, textual nature that highlights the quality of the variables. Results: A study on Uber in Ecuador reveals increasing job insecurity, highlighting the urgent need for regulation to improve working conditions in this digital environment. Discussion: Legislation should prioritize access to social security for “uberized” workers, through a system of shared contributions between platforms and workers. In addition, it is essential to implement accessible conflict resolution mechanisms, such as mediation or arbitration, that allow for the effective defense of their rights. These measures, together with incentives for the formalization of employment and the creation of training programs, will strengthen labor protection and reduce the vulnerabilities of these workers in the digital economy. Conclusions: The implications of the results of the study underline the urgency of a comprehensive review of Ecuadorian labor legislation in the context of the platform economy. Adapting regulations to the realities of uberized workers is essential to ensure the protection of their rights and promote greater equity in the labor market. Robust and effective regulations are required to guarantee fundamental rights, including the right to work.
References
Díaz , J. & Gavela, R. (2022). Informalidad en America Latina y precariedad laboral en Ecuador. Periodo 2019-2020. Escuela Politecnica Nacional, Quito. https://bibdigital.epn.edu.ec/bitstream/15000/22914/1/CD%2012370.pdf
Díaz, M. (2021). Precariedad y lucha por derechos en la era digital: el trabajo de reparto en plataformas digitales en Ciudad de México y Buenos Aires. FLACSO Mexico, Mexico. https://flacso.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/bitstream/1026/379/3/Diaz_MA.pdf
Fortún, M. (13 de Septiembre de 2019). Informaldiad Laboral-Economipedia. https://economipedia.com/definiciones/informalidad-laboral.html
González, P. (2024). Uber: Más de 25.000 conductores en Ecuador dan sus servicios en la aplicación. Primicias. https://www.primicias.ec/economia/uber-conductores-ecuador-aplicacion-carros-electricos-77568/
Guerrero, E. (2015). Reforma del estado como mecanismo de control en democracia delegativa: caso reforma judicial Ecuador 2007-2014 . (s.e.).
Gutiérrez, R. (2016). Introducción al Método Científico. Ed. Esfinge.
Guzmán, I. (2022). El trabajador de plataformas digitales independiente: Análisis crítico de la Ley N°21.431 a la luz de los nuevos indicios de subordinación. Universidad de Chile. https://repositorio.uchile.cl/bitstream/handle/2250/194630/El-trabajador-de-plataformas-digitales-independiente-analisis-critico-de-la-Ley-no-21431.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Jaramillo, E. (2022). La eventual vulneración de los derechos laborales a causa de la flexibilidad laboral, por la aplicación de la Ley Orgánica de Apoyo Humanitario en el Ecuador en un contexto pospandemia. Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. https://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/bitstream/10644/9182/1/T4015-MDLSS-Jaramillo-La%20eventual.pdf
Melo, A. (2018). Regulación de las nuevas formas de empleo que surgen por medio de las plataformas digitales. Universidad Catolitca de Colombia. https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/59a75ee0-99c9-45a4-9122-8c5397576d52/content
Organización Internacional de Trabajo. (5 de octubre de 2024). Organización Internacional de Trabajo. https://www.mindmeister.com/app/map/2943257769?t=3JH0HJzEtb
Palacios, V. (2021). La precarización laboral en las plataformas digitales que funcionan bajo. Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito. http://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/22000/19133
Pinos, E. (2024). Las nuevas tecnologias y el derecho laboral en Ecuador. Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. https://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/bitstream/10644/10003/1/T4386-MDLSS-Pinos-Las%20nuevas.pdf
Salazar, C. (2021). “Con Uber yo puedo sobrevivir, pero progresar no”: el trabajo en plataformas digitales de transporte en Quito (Ecuador) dentro de un mercado laboral pauperizado. Revista Latinoamericana de Antropologia del Trabajo, 5(10). https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6680/668070945006/html/
Sztulwark, S. (2020). La condición periférica en el nuevo capitalismo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía, 51(200). doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2020.200.68283
Vargas, G. (2017). El costo de la transacción tributaria y el cumplimiento de las obligaciones fiscales en las pequeñas y medianas empresas, sector comercio de la provincia de Tungurahua. Universidad Técnica de Ambato.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lidia de las Mercedes Ferrer-Tellez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that offering the public free access to research helps a greater global exchange of knowledge. Each author is responsible for the content of each of their articles.