From AI-Generated Responses to Independent Judgment: Critical Thinking and Student Autonomy
Abstract
Introduction: The growing integration of generative artificial intelligence into higher education has transformed the way students access, process, and produce information, creating new learning opportunities while also raising risks associated with cognitive dependence. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between the use of generative artificial intelligence, critical thinking, and student autonomy, identifying the conditions that foster independent judgment and those that may promote excessive delegation of reasoning. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, considering publications from 2021 to 2026 in high-impact academic databases. After the identification, screening, and eligibility stages, 24 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. The results revealed four main thematic areas: AI as cognitive support, critical thinking and evaluation of AI-generated responses, self-regulation and student agency, and cognitive dependence or cognitive offloading. Conclusions: It is concluded that AI does not automatically strengthen or weaken student autonomy; its effect depends on the degree of cognitive control retained by the learner. When AI-generated responses are contrasted, verified, and critically reflected upon, AI can enhance learning; when they are accepted uncritically, the risk of dependence and loss of independent judgment increases.
References
Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). ChatGPT in the higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102411. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411.
Bosch, C., & Kruger, D. (2024). AI chatbots as Open Educational Resources: Enhancing student agency and self-directed learning. Italian Journal of Educational Technology. DOI: 10.17471/2499-4324/1326.
Camastra, F. D., & González Vallejo, R. (2025). Inteligencia artificial, sostenibilidad e impacto ambiental. Un estudio narrativo y bibliométrico. Región Científica, 4(1), 2025355. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2025355
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 38. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8.
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: A case of ChatGPT. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 2401–2416. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-024-10366-w.
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers & Education, 210, 104967. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967.
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A. B., & Amankwa, J. O. (2024). ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100198. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198.
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846.
Iqbal, J., Hashmi, Z. F., Asghar, M. Z., & Abid, M. N. (2025). Generative AI tool use enhances academic achievement in sustainable education through shared metacognition and cognitive offloading among preservice teachers. Scientific Reports, 15, 16610. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-01676-x.
Larson, B. Z., Moser, C., Caza, A., Muehlfeld, K., & Colombo, L. A. (2024). Critical thinking in the age of generative AI. Academy of Management Learning & Education. DOI: 10.5465/amle.2024.0338.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. DOI: 10.3390/educsci13040410.
Martínez-Peláez, R., Mena, L. J., Toral-Cruz, H., Ochoa-Brust, A., González Potes, A., Flores, V., Ostos, R., Ramírez Pacheco, J. C., Félix, R. A., & Félix, V. G. (2025). Can large language models foster critical thinking, teamwork, and problem-solving skills in higher education? A literature review. Systems, 13(11), 1013. DOI: 10.3390/systems13111013.
Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024). Empowering student self-regulated learning and science education through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1328–1353. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13454.
Padilla Hernández, S. G. (2026). Confianza del cliente en la inteligencia artificial aplicada a servicios bancarios: tendencias y agenda de investigación. Región Científica, 5(1), 2026520. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2026520
Padilla Hernández, S. G. (2024). Inteligencia Artificial en los servicios bancarios. Una revisión bibliométrica. Región Científica, 3(2), 2024335. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024335
Santana González, Y. (2025). La inteligencia artificial DeepSeek en la educación médica cubana: oportunidad para liderar la innovación global. Revista Cubana de Medicina, 64, e5061. https://revmedicina.sld.cu/index.php/med/article/view/5061
Sardiñas Padilla, E., & Valdés García, K. (2025). Incorporación de la inteligencia artificial a la educación cubana. Ventajas y limitaciones. Región Científica, 4(1), 2025372. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2025372
Sperling, K., Stenberg, C.-J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., & Stenliden, L. (2024). In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100169. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169.
Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2023). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x.
Trombetta Silvero, C. E., Patiño Sotelo, A., Basili Carreras, J. L., & Pintos Coronel, M. R. (2026). El rol de la inteligencia artificial en la formación de ingenieros agrónomos: oportunidades y desafíos. Región Científica, 5(1), 2026595. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2026595
Tzirides, A. O., Zapata, G., Kastania, N. P., Saini, A. K., Castro, V., Ismael, S. A., You, Y.-L., Afonso dos Santos, T., Searsmith, D., O'Brien, C., Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2024). Combining human and artificial intelligence for enhanced AI literacy in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100184. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100184.
Urban, M., Brom, C., Lukavský, J., Děchtěrenko, F., Hein, V., Svacha, F., Kmoníčková, P., & Urban, K. (2025). “ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.” Epistemic beliefs and metacognitive accuracy in students' integration of ChatGPT content into academic writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 1897–1918. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13591.
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 15. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3.
Xia, L., Shen, K., Sun, H., An, X., et al. (2025). Developing and validating the student learning agency scale in generative artificial intelligence (AI)-supported contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 13999–14021. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-13137-5.
Xu, X., Qiao, L., Cheng, N., Liu, H., & Zhao, W. (2025). Enhancing self-regulated learning and learning experience in generative AI environments: The critical role of metacognitive support. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1842–1863. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13599.
Yang, Y., Luo, J., Yang, M., Yang, R., & Chen, J. (2024). From surface to deep learning approaches with Generative AI in higher education: An analytical framework of student agency. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 817–830. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2024.2327003.
Yao, Y., Sun, Y., Zhu, S., & Zhu, X. (2025). A qualitative inquiry into metacognitive strategies of postgraduate students in employing ChatGPT for English academic writing. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12824. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12824.
Zapata Muriel, F. A., Montoya Zapata, S., & Montoya-Zapata, D. (2024). Dilemas éticos planteados por el auge de la inteligencia artificial: una mirada desde el transhumanismo. Región Científica, 3(1), 2024225. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024225
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juan de Jesús Alvarado Ortiz, Oralia Mercedes Moguel Morales, Francisco Jesús Vieyra González, Onelia Hernández Torres

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that offering the public free access to research helps a greater global exchange of knowledge. Each author is responsible for the content of each of their articles.










Universidad de Oriente